Bitcoin: quasi un quinto del mining è in mano a società quotate in borsa

ah 14 miliardi, du' spicci

e quanto è la percentuale di malaffare su e-banking/pagamenti digitali classici?

allora, facciamo due calcoli...

se la memoria non mi inganna, rispolverando le vecchie nozioni di matematica avanzata, sfruttando il calcolo integrale e basandomi sul numero irreale į possiamo dedurre con buona certezza che:

100-1 = 99

si, 99 sono abbastanza sicuro...

di questo 99 una parte saranno contanti, una parte private banking vari, una parte carte di debito, prepagate varie e porcate di quel tipo...


quindi il 99% si basa sul vecchio sisistema per cui ti batti cosi strenuamente...

pazzesco he?!

avevo letto male, avevo letto che l'1% delle crypto fossero investite in malaffare. mea culpa.
mi interessa sapere la percentuale in crypto investita in malaffare la percentuale di e-banking/pagamenti digitale classici investita in malaffare in modo da delineare quale dei due metodi sia più affine alla criminalità organizzata

Decentralization.
There’s no clear definition of what “decentralization” really means. Two aspects are clear, though: One, complete decentralization (i.e., no single point of control, anywhere) is neither possible nor desirable, and two, there’s a lot of “decentralization theatre”: For example, Ethereum activity would grind to a halt if centrally controlled services such as Infura and Alchemy were to stop; NFT marketplaces could decide unilaterally when and how to intervene; and the control points in so-called smart contracts would quickly become obvious when something goes wrong and somebody steps in to stop the code.

Code and protocols (they must be open and transparent). Ensuring that all code is available for inspection sounds great, but vanishingly few people have the ability, the free time, and the desire to inspect reams of complex code. Further, having all code running on public blockchains also increases the attack surface — and we can see from almost daily reports about Web3 hacks and exploits that code quality isn’t improving. It’s also worth remembering that open and transparent code has always performed critical tasks on the internet (think Apache and Linux, etc.); that hasn’t stopped today’s tech giants from earning trillions by concentrating power.

User-controlled apps and networks.
This principle belongs in the category of “techno-utopian aspiration.” Most people won’t be interested enough in rule changes or matters of dispute to turn up and vote on them. There’s also the risk that vested interests will prevail to the detriment of the broader ecosystem: This isn’t a theoretical risk; we’ve seen this play out in several blockchain projects. And we know from online communities over the decades that community governance is a challenge at the best of times; adding a financial element increases the potential for disaster.
[COLOR="Blue"]
Somewhat ironically, perhaps, the amount of funding flowing into Web3 is part of the problem: Until the financiers turn off this cash spigot, Web3 hype will continue and “get rich quick” schemes will crowd out worthier developments.[/COLOR]

Consiglio a tutti di dare un occhiata a quanto pubblicato da Forrester Research (azienda che fa analisi di mercato) :

https://www.forrester.com/blogs/web...-of-todays-web/

https://www.forrester.com/report/we...tmare/RES177246

https://www.forrester.com/report/we...-true/RES177247

In particolare:

visione che ci sta e rispetto....ma mooooolto pessimista, forse anche troppo..