Quote:
Originariamente inviato da Alpha4
Usare e appioppare il termine fanboy è proprio una cosa infantile.
Serve a sentirsi superiori un po' come dare del fascista a chiunque non sia di sinistra..
Dove ci sono dati e studi i numeri sono palesi, poi si può fare finta di non saperlo.
https://www.tesla.com/it_it/VehicleSafetyReport#q2-2025 |
A cazzariiii
Oh questo non è no-watt-online, è Electrek
https://electrek.co/2025/03/17/tesla...topilot-crash/
Tesla fans expose Tesla’s own shadiness in attempt to defend Autopilot crash
A group of Tesla fans and investors has inadvertently exposed Tesla’s shadiness regarding crashes involving Autopilot by attempting to claim that the advanced driver-assist system was not active in a crash test.
It was not only active, but it also disengaged itself less than a second before the crash—a known shady behavior of Tesla’s Autopilot.
Yesterday, we reported on a crash test video that demonstrates the difference between camera-based and lidar-based advanced driver assist (ADAS) systems by famous engineering Youtuber Mark Rober.
The video included a series of tests in which a Tesla Model Y on Autopilot went against a vehicle equipped with an ADAS system powered by a lidar sensor.
The last test was the headline-grabbing one as it tested to see if the vehicles would stop for a Wile E. Coyote-style fake road wall in the middle of the road, but it was simply to illustrate the clear advantage of lidar in this case.
The other tests involving fog and rain where lidar outperformed Tesla’s vision-based system were obviously the more relevant and newsworthy tests.