[Romagnolo1973]

sul sito di AV-Comparatives ci sono gli altri test da vedere

Se si ha la pazienza di leggere il PDF del test fatto da AV-C si legge una assoluta verità che va evidenziata :

Security products need to load on systems at an early stage to provide security from the very begin-
ning – this load has some impact on the time needed for a system to start up. Measuring boot times
accurately is challenging. The most significant issue is to define exactly when the system is fully
started, as many operating environments may continue to perform start-up activities for some time
after the system appears responsive to the user. It is also important to consider when the protection
provided by the security solution being tested is fully active, as this could be a useful measure of
boot completion as far as the security solution is concerned. Some Anti-Virus products are loading
their services very late (even minutes later) at boot (users may notice that after some time that the
system loaded, the system gets very slow for some moments), so the system looks like loading very
fast, but it just loads its services later and makes the system also insecure/vulnerable. As we do not
want to support such activities, we still do not measure boot times.
To support our concerns, we tested if the products are loading all their protection modules before e.g.
malware in the start-up folder is executed. Most products failed this test, except AhnLab, Avast, AVG,
Bitdefender, Panda, Sophos and Webroot. Only those products detected and blocked the malware be-
fore its execution after system start-up (by loading itself at an early stage). In all other cases first the
malware was successfully executed and only later detected by the security suites, when the system
was already compromised. The boot process for those products took only in some cases marginally
longer than the one of the products which loaded their modules later.


Ricordatevene quando dovete scegliere l'AV o la suite per il vostro pc