nicods
09-11-2005, 08:58
Si trovano recensioni della S5600 della Fujifilm?
In rete trovo un sacco di pareri di utenti che l'hanno provata/comprata e la dipingono spesso migliore della S9500 per alcuni aspetti (ad esempio per il rumore, e non mi sorprende se vedo che l'ottica della S5600 è nettamente più luminosa di quella della S9500). La stavo valutando anche per un eventuale acquisto (in pratica risolve 3 delle 4 gravi pecche che io riscontro nella S9500: il prezzo, l'ottica poco luminosa, la lunghezza focale massima troppo ridotta per una superzoom; se avesse anche lo stabilizzatore sarebbe grande!) e vorrei chiedervi se avete trovato recensioni autorevoli e complete in giro di questo modello (o anche gallerie fotografiche, perché da quel punto di vista la sorella maggiore S9500 mi ha un po' deluso).
A livello di controlli manuali cosa offre e cosa le manca rispetto la S9500 (penso che il punto dolente nel confronto sia questo, dato che i 9 MPix a me non servono)?
P.S.:
Esempio di recensione di un utente trovata nel forum di dpreview:
"I bought the killer toy saturday and i wanted to spent some word for the sceptics out there.
I can make direct comparision with s5500 and s9500 since they both are in house.
Ergonomic: dimension is almost the same of the s5500 (and similar to the 350d but the fuji feels better in hand :D). I will say it is well designed and nice to see. Zoom buttons moved up and feels better in big hands. The bigger LCD moved every button in the right side and this is better than before.
Speed: probably the faster fuji around out today, instant on, fast operation, decent burst. 5mpix are well supported by actual camera processor. Faster than both s9500 and s5500. s5500 has TOP4 instead of TOP3 probably due to bigger image size.
Optic: less cromatic aberration than s5500, seems to capture more light than s9500 in same condition (but s9500 optics have to do a different job!). I will have preferred a 28-200 rather than a 38-380 but i'm anyway happy. supermacro is also a big missing. Nonprotruding lenes will save same battery also.
ISO: better performance than s9500! Obviously the s5500 is not in competition. There is a consistent difference in between iso 400 and iso 800 at a noise level so i think that a iso 640 value would have been useful (Firmware upgrade? :D). Looking at iso chart in the low iso setting the s5600 should be nicely near d50 and 350d witch is not bad.
MENU: apparently a consistent step back. some options are too nested and some more shortcut combination of buttons will be really useful (example: burst on/off via continuous button+down). RAW, as everyone here sayd, should be placed above 5M fine in menu, with some other compression option (i can understand no 3M fine because same size of %M normal but what about 3:2 fine?).
Noise reduction: obviously is the photoshop one. i noticed it become more aggressive when noise grow, indipendently from the iso setting. I will be happier if the NR should be disabled sometime.
A simple RAW compression will save a 30% space.
my s5600 firmware is 1.00
s9500 is 1.01"
In rete trovo un sacco di pareri di utenti che l'hanno provata/comprata e la dipingono spesso migliore della S9500 per alcuni aspetti (ad esempio per il rumore, e non mi sorprende se vedo che l'ottica della S5600 è nettamente più luminosa di quella della S9500). La stavo valutando anche per un eventuale acquisto (in pratica risolve 3 delle 4 gravi pecche che io riscontro nella S9500: il prezzo, l'ottica poco luminosa, la lunghezza focale massima troppo ridotta per una superzoom; se avesse anche lo stabilizzatore sarebbe grande!) e vorrei chiedervi se avete trovato recensioni autorevoli e complete in giro di questo modello (o anche gallerie fotografiche, perché da quel punto di vista la sorella maggiore S9500 mi ha un po' deluso).
A livello di controlli manuali cosa offre e cosa le manca rispetto la S9500 (penso che il punto dolente nel confronto sia questo, dato che i 9 MPix a me non servono)?
P.S.:
Esempio di recensione di un utente trovata nel forum di dpreview:
"I bought the killer toy saturday and i wanted to spent some word for the sceptics out there.
I can make direct comparision with s5500 and s9500 since they both are in house.
Ergonomic: dimension is almost the same of the s5500 (and similar to the 350d but the fuji feels better in hand :D). I will say it is well designed and nice to see. Zoom buttons moved up and feels better in big hands. The bigger LCD moved every button in the right side and this is better than before.
Speed: probably the faster fuji around out today, instant on, fast operation, decent burst. 5mpix are well supported by actual camera processor. Faster than both s9500 and s5500. s5500 has TOP4 instead of TOP3 probably due to bigger image size.
Optic: less cromatic aberration than s5500, seems to capture more light than s9500 in same condition (but s9500 optics have to do a different job!). I will have preferred a 28-200 rather than a 38-380 but i'm anyway happy. supermacro is also a big missing. Nonprotruding lenes will save same battery also.
ISO: better performance than s9500! Obviously the s5500 is not in competition. There is a consistent difference in between iso 400 and iso 800 at a noise level so i think that a iso 640 value would have been useful (Firmware upgrade? :D). Looking at iso chart in the low iso setting the s5600 should be nicely near d50 and 350d witch is not bad.
MENU: apparently a consistent step back. some options are too nested and some more shortcut combination of buttons will be really useful (example: burst on/off via continuous button+down). RAW, as everyone here sayd, should be placed above 5M fine in menu, with some other compression option (i can understand no 3M fine because same size of %M normal but what about 3:2 fine?).
Noise reduction: obviously is the photoshop one. i noticed it become more aggressive when noise grow, indipendently from the iso setting. I will be happier if the NR should be disabled sometime.
A simple RAW compression will save a 30% space.
my s5600 firmware is 1.00
s9500 is 1.01"