Quote:
Originariamente inviato da dwfgerw
Su hwuupgrade viene descritta come una totale vittoria di epic, ma in realtā non ha vinto ne epic e neanche apple, solo i consumatori. Il giudice ha confermato che app store non rappresenta in alcun modo un monopolio, e questo per apple era molto importante certificarlo.
Ecco un estratto
Today the Court has affirmed what we've known all along: the App Store is not in violation of antitrust law. As the Court recognized 'success is not illegal.' Apple faces rigorous competition in every segment in which we do business, and we believe customers and developers choose us because our products and services are the best in the world.
Apple's termination of the DPLA and the related agreements between Epic Games and Apple was valid, lawful, and enforceable, and Apple has the contractual right to terminate its DPLA with any or all of Epic Games' wholly owned subsidiaries, affiliates, and/or otherentities under Epic Games' control at any time and at Apple's sole discretion.
Apple: We are pleased with Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers' finding that Apple engaged in anti-competitive conduct and has permanently prohibited their anti-steering provisions. This and other developments around the world show that there is strong need and momentum for legislation to address these and many other unfair practices, which are designed to hurt competition and consumers. This task has never been more urgent."
|
Il giudice ne sapra' sicuramente piu' di me e quindi non mi metto a dire che ha sbagliato; semplicemente non capisco come puo' non essere in regime di monopolio il fatto che su iOS ci possa essere solo lo store di Apple e non quelli alternativi. E' come se su windows non potessero esistere steam e epic game store ma l'unico store supportato e' quello di windows. E se la gente direbbe che possono prendersi un android, anche lato PC uno puo' prendere anche linux, ma intanto microsoft si e' vista pagare lo scotto di monopolio, ad esempio con la vecchia storia del browser.