[MiloZ]

Originariamente inviato da Psyred

Anche pingandolo direttamente la latenza è normale, secondo me se cambi IP si sistema tutto.

Esecuzione di Ping 89.149.187.169 con 32 byte di dati:
Risposta da 89.149.187.169: byte=32 durata=38ms TTL=57
Risposta da 89.149.187.169: byte=32 durata=37ms TTL=57
Risposta da 89.149.187.169: byte=32 durata=36ms TTL=57
Risposta da 89.149.187.169: byte=32 durata=36ms TTL=57

Statistiche Ping per 89.149.187.169:
    Pacchetti: Trasmessi = 4, Ricevuti = 4,
    Persi = 0 (0% persi),
Tempo approssimativo percorsi andata/ritorno in millisecondi:
    Minimo = 36ms, Massimo =  38ms, Medio =  36ms

Dipende proprio dalla classe IP. con un 82.x.x

Source address is 192.168.1.10; using ICMP echo-request, ID=4412
Pinging 89.149.187.169 [89.149.187.169]
with 32 bytes data (60 bytes IP):

From 89.149.187.169: bytes=60 seq=0001 TTL=56 ID=b718 time=118.017ms
From 89.149.187.169: bytes=60 seq=0002 TTL=56 ID=bdea time=105.593ms
From 89.149.187.169: bytes=60 seq=0003 TTL=56 ID=c1f8 time=117.264ms
From 89.149.187.169: bytes=60 seq=0004 TTL=56 ID=c4c8 time=113.144ms

Packets: sent=4, rcvd=4, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 1.613763 sec
RTTs in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 105.593 / 113.504 / 118.017 / 4.929
Bandwidth in kbytes/sec: sent=0.148, rcvd=0.148

Con 79.x

Source address is 192.168.1.10; using ICMP echo-request, ID=bc1e
Pinging 89.149.187.169 [89.149.187.169]
with 32 bytes data (60 bytes IP):

From 89.149.187.169: bytes=60 seq=0001 TTL=57 ID=3cc8 time=31.688ms
From 89.149.187.169: bytes=60 seq=0002 TTL=57 ID=3ff8 time=30.391ms
From 89.149.187.169: bytes=60 seq=0003 TTL=57 ID=422b time=30.965ms
From 89.149.187.169: bytes=60 seq=0004 TTL=57 ID=4488 time=30.534ms

Packets: sent=4, rcvd=4, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 1.532670 sec
RTTs in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 30.391 / 30.894 / 31.688 / 0.504
Bandwidth in kbytes/sec: sent=0.156, rcvd=0.156