View Single Post
Old 03-03-2009, 14:19   #768
zappy
Senior Member
 
L'Avatar di zappy
 
Iscritto dal: Oct 2001
Messaggi: 20542
Quote:
Originariamente inviato da ConteZero Guarda i messaggi
Quote:
On September 1st, 1989 the THTR-300 was deactivated due to its cost and increased public scrutiny following both the Chernobyl accident and the THTR-300 fuel pellet event of May 4, 1985, in which a fuel pellet became lodged in a fuel feed pipe to the core. On October 10th, 1991, the 180 meter high dry cooling tower, which at one time was the highest cooling tower in the world, was explosively dismantled and from October 22nd, 1993 to April 1995 the remaining plant was decommissioned.

From 1985 to 1989 the THTR-300 registered 16410 operation hours and generated 2891000 MWh according to a full-load working time of 423 days. By 1982 it was planned by a group of firms to proceed with construction of a HTR-500, the successor of the THTR-300, but up-rated to a thermal output of 1250 megawatts and an electrical output of 500 megawatts.
Non male per un generatore "sperimentale".
meglio di Superphenix, che non ha mai superato il ~12% della potenza di progetto. E pensare che SPX in teoria avrebbe dovto essere una centrale prototipo, non un reattore sperimentale...
__________________
Mai discutere con un idiota. Ti trascina al suo livello e ti batte con l'esperienza (O.W.)
zappy è offline   Rispondi citando il messaggio o parte di esso