Quote:
Originariamente inviato da matmat86
il commento di andrewip parla chiaro
|
Parla chiaro sì, ma del MacBook (come ha specificato lui stesso su mia richiesta):
Quote:
Originariamente inviato da andrewip
@Lucatortuga
Macbook
|
Mentre la rece di Gizmodo sottolinea come lo schermo del Pro (ossia il modello di cui si parla in questo thread) sia qualitativamente migliore:
Quote:
The screens, too, are deceptively different between the MB and MBP. Both share LED backlighting and the shiny screen coating that can be quite a distraction—a user will find himself staring at his reflection with any decent amount of ambient light. But it's important to note that, beyond the spec-sheet distinction of the 13-inch screen's 1280x800 pixels and the 15-incher's 1440x900, these are not identical LCD technologies in different sizes.
The difference is clear when demoing an MPEG4 of Batman Begins. The MBP screen is warmer than the MB's to the discerning eye, but any dunce will catch the massive differences in contrast and viewing angle. Our shots in the dark exacerbate the MB's less impressive black levels, but this photo really is close to what we saw. As for the unwatchable distortions in image quality when five feet out or standing at a not-so-unthinkable viewing angle, those are just as bad to the naked eye as they are to camera. Notice the MBP screen remains unblemished from any angle/distance.
|
http://gizmodo.com/5063492/macbook-a...ro-dual-review
__________________
"Personalmente non ho nulla contro chi crede in un Dio, non importa quale. Sono contrario a chi pretende che il suo Dio sia l’autorità che gli permette di imporre delle restrizioni allo sviluppo e alla gioia dell’umanità" (Alexander S. Neill, «Summerhill», 1960).
Ultima modifica di LucaTortuga : 17-10-2008 alle 12:56.
|