Rei & Asuka
16-12-2004, 12:09
Signori, qualcuno sa tradurmelo?
Se non ho capito male Muskin e AMD si lamentano x il DOT vero?
Sudhain Media has stumble across something that is sure to brew up a lot of commotion.
As a result of MSI's attempting to market a product feature they didn't actually have, both Mushkin and AMD easily could've come off second-rate, as could the Neo2 itself, billed as a "non-enthusiast" board. The ease with which this could've happened is disturbing, given the fact that I essentially stumbled on Everest's correct diagnosis. I'm disgusted with MSI over pulling this without thought to the consequence for other company's or themselves, and I'm disturbed at the lengths to which they are obviously willing to stealth overclock an end-user's system without their awareness. Keep in mind, I had the "Aggressive Timing" and "Dynamic Overclocking" features disabled.
Basically the issue boils down to MSI trying to simulate .5 multipliers with a combination of bus speed increases and multiplier changes.
Se non ho capito male Muskin e AMD si lamentano x il DOT vero?
Sudhain Media has stumble across something that is sure to brew up a lot of commotion.
As a result of MSI's attempting to market a product feature they didn't actually have, both Mushkin and AMD easily could've come off second-rate, as could the Neo2 itself, billed as a "non-enthusiast" board. The ease with which this could've happened is disturbing, given the fact that I essentially stumbled on Everest's correct diagnosis. I'm disgusted with MSI over pulling this without thought to the consequence for other company's or themselves, and I'm disturbed at the lengths to which they are obviously willing to stealth overclock an end-user's system without their awareness. Keep in mind, I had the "Aggressive Timing" and "Dynamic Overclocking" features disabled.
Basically the issue boils down to MSI trying to simulate .5 multipliers with a combination of bus speed increases and multiplier changes.