Matz
11-12-2003, 11:21
Ma e' meglio la 5700 o la 5900?!
No perche' dalle caratteristiche sembra meglio la prima:
fx5700ultra:
Caratteristiche Principali
NVIDIA® CineFX™ 2.0 engine
256-bit Graphics Core
475MHz core clock
128-bit DDR2 memory interface
450MHz memory clock (900MHz memory data rate)
14.4GB/sec. memory bandwidth
1.9 billion texels/sec. fill rate
356 million vertices/sec. setup
4 pixels per clock (peak)
16 textures per pixel (max) con 8 textures applied per clock
Dual 400MHz RAMDACs
fx5900:
PERFORMANCE FEATURES
CineFX 2.0 Graphics Engine
256-bit graphics core
256-bit memory interface
400MHz core clock
850MHz Memory Data Rate
300 million vertices/sec
8 pixels per clock (peak)
16 textures per pixel(max in a single rendering pass)with 8 textures applied per clock
Dual 400MHz RAMDAC's
DX9 with Vertex Shader 2.0+ and Pixel Shader 2.0+
Max display resolution 2048 x 1536 x 32 bpp at 85Hz
Anche se la differenza fosse minima la prima costa molto meno!
ciao
No perche' dalle caratteristiche sembra meglio la prima:
fx5700ultra:
Caratteristiche Principali
NVIDIA® CineFX™ 2.0 engine
256-bit Graphics Core
475MHz core clock
128-bit DDR2 memory interface
450MHz memory clock (900MHz memory data rate)
14.4GB/sec. memory bandwidth
1.9 billion texels/sec. fill rate
356 million vertices/sec. setup
4 pixels per clock (peak)
16 textures per pixel (max) con 8 textures applied per clock
Dual 400MHz RAMDACs
fx5900:
PERFORMANCE FEATURES
CineFX 2.0 Graphics Engine
256-bit graphics core
256-bit memory interface
400MHz core clock
850MHz Memory Data Rate
300 million vertices/sec
8 pixels per clock (peak)
16 textures per pixel(max in a single rendering pass)with 8 textures applied per clock
Dual 400MHz RAMDAC's
DX9 with Vertex Shader 2.0+ and Pixel Shader 2.0+
Max display resolution 2048 x 1536 x 32 bpp at 85Hz
Anche se la differenza fosse minima la prima costa molto meno!
ciao